An attorney for a Texas pipeline company says he will show at trial that various Greenpeace entities coordinated delays and ...
1don MSN
The case is tied to protests in 2016 and 2017 of the Dakota Access Pipeline and its controversial Missouri River crossing ...
Energy Transfer, which owns the Dakota Access Pipeline, is seeking $300 million, a sum that Greenpeace says could bankrupt ...
A coalition of media organizations, including the North Dakota Monitor, petitioned the state Supreme Court Thursday seeking ...
An attorney representing the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline told a jury of Morton County residents on Wednesday morning that Greenpeace was secretly behind the protests ...
1d
ICT News on MSNJury selection begins in civil trial brought by Dakota Access Pipeline developer against GreenpeaceA behemoth defamation lawsuit brought by the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline against Greenpeace began its trial in a ...
A $300 million lawsuit a pipeline company brought against Greenpeace in North Dakota has ... 2017 and is set to go to trial Monday, centers on the fight over the Dakota Access pipeline nearly ...
4don MSN
A Texas-based company claims the environmental advocacy group tried to delay construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline with ...
Energy Transfer, the company that operates the Dakota Access Pipeline, is seeking a $300 million judgment against Greenpeace in a case that has stretched nearly six years.
A group of attorneys, activists and academics will be monitoring an upcoming trial between the developer of the Dakota Access ...
Energy Transfer says Greenpeace used tactics including defamation, vandalism and harassment in an attempt to tarnish the ...
“Our goal was to be a good corporate citizen in North Dakota,” Cox said ... asks for damages in an amount to be proved at trial. Because of Greenpeace, Energy Transfer incurred over $82 ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results